| Title |
Pediatric Drug Safety Signal Detection: A New Drug–Event Reference Set for Performance Testing of Data-Mining Methods and Systems
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Drug Safety, February 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40264-015-0265-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Osemeke U. Osokogu, Federica Fregonese, Carmen Ferrajolo, Katia Verhamme, Sandra de Bie, Geert ’t Jong, Mariana Catapano, Daniel Weibel, Florentia Kaguelidou, Wichor M. Bramer, Yingfen Hsia, Ian C. K. Wong, Madlen Gazarian, Jan Bonhoeffer, Miriam Sturkenboom |
| Abstract |
Better evidence regarding drug safety in the pediatric population might be generated from existing data sources such as spontaneous reporting systems and electronic healthcare records. The Global Research in Paediatrics (GRiP)-Network of Excellence aims to develop pediatric-specific methods that can be applied to these data sources. A reference set of positive and negative drug-event associations is required. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 99 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Finland | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 97 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 26 | 26% |
| Researcher | 16 | 16% |
| Other | 10 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 15 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 33 | 33% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 18 | 18% |
| Computer Science | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 4% |
| Psychology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 13 | 13% |
| Unknown | 19 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,402,666
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Drug Safety
#1,522
of 1,697 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,770
of 353,704 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Drug Safety
#17
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,697 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.7. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 353,704 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.