↓ Skip to main content

資源管理における行政への協力意図に関する地域と都市の住民比較:内モンゴルの草原管理を事例として

Overview of attention for article published in THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Readers on

mendeley
2 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
資源管理における行政への協力意図に関する地域と都市の住民比較:内モンゴルの草原管理を事例として
Published in
THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, January 2017
DOI 10.2130/jjesp.1606
Authors

坂本 剛, 野波 寛, 蘇米雅, 哈斯額尓敦, 大友 章司, 田代 豊

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 2 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 2 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 1 50%
Unknown 1 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Unknown 2 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 October 2022.
All research outputs
#14,918,049
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#131
of 366 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#220,159
of 421,709 outputs
Outputs of similar age from THE JAPANESE JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY
#13
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 366 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 421,709 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.