↓ Skip to main content

Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Adolescents: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in Obesity Surgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (91st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
policy
1 policy source
twitter
9 X users
facebook
4 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
185 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
212 Mendeley
Title
Bariatric Surgery in Morbidly Obese Adolescents: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Published in
Obesity Surgery, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11695-015-1581-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Givan F. Paulus, Loes E. G. de Vaan, Froukje J. Verdam, Nicole D. Bouvy, Ton A. W. Ambergen, L. W. Ernest van Heurn

Abstract

Pubmed, Embase, and Cochrane were systematically reviewed for available evidence on bariatric surgery in adolescents. Thirty-seven included studies evaluated the effect of laparoscopic adjustable gastric banding (LAGB), Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB), or laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) in patients ≤18 years old. Fifteen of 37 studies were prospective, including one RCT. Mean body mass index (BMI) loss after LAGB was 11.6 kg/m(2) (95 % CI 9.8-13.4), versus 16.6 kg/m(2) (95 % CI 13.4-19.8) after RYGB and 14.1 kg/m(2) (95 % CI 10.8-17.5) after LSG. Two unrelated deaths were reported after 495 RYGB procedures. All three bariatric procedures result in substantial weight loss and improvement of comorbidity with an acceptable complication rate, indicating that surgical intervention is applicable in appropriately selected morbidly obese adolescents.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 212 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 3 1%
Chile 1 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Unknown 207 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 31 15%
Student > Bachelor 26 12%
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 16 8%
Other 42 20%
Unknown 54 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 93 44%
Nursing and Health Professions 15 7%
Psychology 13 6%
Social Sciences 6 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 16 8%
Unknown 64 30%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 February 2021.
All research outputs
#1,658,697
of 22,919,505 outputs
Outputs from Obesity Surgery
#142
of 3,389 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,231
of 254,906 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Obesity Surgery
#6
of 85 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,919,505 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,389 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 254,906 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 85 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.