↓ Skip to main content

Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)

Overview of attention for article published in Synthese, October 1974
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
9 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
1250 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
377 Mendeley
Title
Special sciences (or: The disunity of science as a working hypothesis)
Published in
Synthese, October 1974
DOI 10.1007/bf00485230
Authors

J. A. Fodor

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 377 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 2%
Germany 3 <1%
Canada 3 <1%
Italy 2 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Romania 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 355 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 107 28%
Student > Master 52 14%
Researcher 38 10%
Unspecified 29 8%
Student > Bachelor 28 7%
Other 82 22%
Unknown 41 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 153 41%
Psychology 46 12%
Unspecified 29 8%
Social Sciences 24 6%
Arts and Humanities 16 4%
Other 67 18%
Unknown 42 11%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 April 2023.
All research outputs
#2,456,265
of 25,761,363 outputs
Outputs from Synthese
#178
of 2,754 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#110
of 3,978 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Synthese
#1
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,761,363 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,754 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 3,978 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them