| Title |
A critical review of glyphosate findings in human urine samples and comparison with the exposure of operators and consumers
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety, January 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00003-014-0927-3 |
| Authors |
Lars Niemann, Christian Sieke, Rudolf Pfeil, Roland Solecki |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 107 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| France | 18 | 17% |
| United States | 11 | 10% |
| Argentina | 5 | 5% |
| Switzerland | 3 | 3% |
| Australia | 2 | 2% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 59 | 55% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 92 | 86% |
| Scientists | 12 | 11% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | <1% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 217 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 215 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 25 | 12% |
| Researcher | 22 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 13% |
| Unknown | 53 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 36 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 22 | 10% |
| Environmental Science | 20 | 9% |
| Chemistry | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 18 | 8% |
| Other | 40 | 18% |
| Unknown | 62 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 116. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 December 2022.
All research outputs
#368,910
of 25,743,152 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#1
of 160 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,257
of 360,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Consumer Protection and Food Safety
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,743,152 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 160 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them