You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Evolution of an Ancient Venom: Recognition of a Novel Family of Cnidarian Toxins and the Common Evolutionary Origin of Sodium and Potassium Neurotoxins in Sea Anemone
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Molecular Biology and Evolution, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1093/molbev/msv050 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mahdokht Jouiaei, Kartik Sunagar, Aya Federman Gross, Holger Scheib, Paul F. Alewood, Yehu Moran, Bryan G. Fry |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 3 | 75% |
| Members of the public | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 85 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 22 | 25% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 18 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 40% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 23 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 4 | 5% |
| Chemistry | 2 | 2% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 6 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 April 2016.
All research outputs
#15,168,964
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#4,182
of 5,214 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#136,383
of 274,196 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Biology and Evolution
#78
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 38th percentile – i.e., 38% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,214 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,196 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 48th percentile – i.e., 48% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.