↓ Skip to main content

Early adolescent outcomes of joint developmental trajectories of problem behavior and IQ in childhood

Overview of attention for article published in European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (53rd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
29 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
156 Mendeley
Title
Early adolescent outcomes of joint developmental trajectories of problem behavior and IQ in childhood
Published in
European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s00787-018-1155-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eirini Flouri, Efstathios Papachristou, Emily Midouhas, Heather Joshi, George B. Ploubidis, Glyn Lewis

Abstract

General cognitive ability (IQ) and problem behavior (externalizing and internalizing problems) are variable and inter-related in children. However, it is unknown how they co-develop in the general child population and how their patterns of co-development may be related to later outcomes. We carried out this study to explore this. Using data from 16,844 Millennium Cohort Study children, we fitted three-parallel-process growth mixture models to identify joint developmental trajectories of internalizing, externalizing and IQ scores at ages 3-11 years. We then examined their associations with age 11 outcomes. We identified a typically developing group (83%) and three atypical groups, all with worse behavior and ability: children with improving behavior and low (but improving in males) ability (6%); children with persistently high levels of problems and low ability (5%); and children with worsening behavior and low ability (6%). Compared to typically developing children, the latter two groups were more likely to show poor decision-making, be bullies or bully victims, engage in antisocial behaviors, skip and dislike school, be unhappy and have low self-esteem. By contrast, children (especially males) in the improver group had outcomes that were similar to, or even better than, those of their typically developing peers. These findings encourage the development of interventions to target children with both cognitive and behavioral difficulties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 156 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 156 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Master 17 11%
Student > Bachelor 13 8%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 8 5%
Other 22 14%
Unknown 61 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 46 29%
Social Sciences 11 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 8 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Neuroscience 4 3%
Other 8 5%
Unknown 71 46%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2021.
All research outputs
#7,554,098
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#813
of 1,653 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#119,697
of 296,868 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry
#15
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,653 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.1. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 296,868 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.