↓ Skip to main content

RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of chemokine CC motif ligand 19 on the proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, September 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
6 Mendeley
Title
RETRACTED ARTICLE: The effect of chemokine CC motif ligand 19 on the proliferation and migration of hepatocellular carcinoma
Published in
Tumor Biology, September 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-2578-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ke-qin Luo, Yi-ni Shi, Ji-cai Peng

Abstract

Multiple studies have shown that CC motif chemokine ligand 19 (CCL19) promotes cell proliferation in several human cancers. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and function of CCL19 in hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Quantitative reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR), Western blot, and immunohistochemistry were performed separately to detect the expression of CCL19 in HCC tissues. The expression of CCL19 and its receptor (CCR7) in different HCC cell lines were screened by Western blot. HCC cell lines were screened and processed with recombinant human CCL19 (rhCCL19) or si-CCL19 RNA. Cell proliferation assay and transwell assay were performed to evaluate the proliferation and migration of HCC cells, respectively. Low expression of CCL19 was observed in 83.72 % (72/86) of the HCC versus 16.67 % (4/24) of the adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues, the difference of CCL19 expression between HCC and adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The expression level of CCL19 mRNA and protein in tumor tissues was significantly lower than adjacent non-tumorous liver tissues. The proliferation and migration of HCC cells were obviously inhibited in rhCCL19-treated groups. Our data suggest that CCL19 may play a suppressive role in the regulation of aggressiveness in human HCC.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 6 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 6 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 2 33%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 17%
Student > Bachelor 1 17%
Other 1 17%
Unknown 1 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 1 17%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 17%
Medicine and Dentistry 1 17%
Chemistry 1 17%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 1 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#18,402,666
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Tumor Biology
#1,369
of 2,622 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,737
of 225,941 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Tumor Biology
#55
of 126 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,622 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.2. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 225,941 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 126 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.