↓ Skip to main content

Balancing bike sharing systems with constraint programming

Overview of attention for article published in Constraints, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#29 of 105)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (55th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
71 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Balancing bike sharing systems with constraint programming
Published in
Constraints, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10601-015-9182-1
Authors

Luca Di Gaspero, Andrea Rendl, Tommaso Urli

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 71 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 1%
Russia 1 1%
Unknown 69 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 25%
Student > Master 15 21%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Researcher 7 10%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 4%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 17 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 24 34%
Computer Science 11 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 8 11%
Mathematics 3 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2 3%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 18 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#12,626,359
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Constraints
#29
of 105 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#111,862
of 255,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Constraints
#3
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 105 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 255,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 6 of them.