↓ Skip to main content

Cultural Adaptation and Translation of Outreach Materials on Autism Spectrum Disorder

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (65th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
48 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
180 Mendeley
Title
Cultural Adaptation and Translation of Outreach Materials on Autism Spectrum Disorder
Published in
Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10803-015-2397-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Roy R. Grinker, Christina D. Kang-Yi, Chloe Ahmann, Rinad S. Beidas, Adrienne Lagman, David S. Mandell

Abstract

In order to connect with families and influence treatment trajectories, outreach materials should address cultural perceptions of the condition, its causes, and post-diagnostic care. This paper describes the cultural adaptation and translation of the Autism Speaks First 100 Days Kit into Korean for the purpose of improving autism spectrum disorder (ASD) diagnosis, assessment, and interventions. The goal of this study is to describe a methodology for future cross-cultural adaptations and translations of outreach materials on ASD, using the Autism Speaks First 100 Days Kit as an exemplar. The research involved two stages of qualitative interviews: unstructured individual and group interviews with 19 Korean child health and education professionals in Queens, NY, followed by structured cultural consensus modeling interviews with 23 Korean mothers, with and without children with ASD, in Queens, NY and the greater Washington, DC area. We conclude that a systematic approach to cultural translation of outreach materials is feasible. Cultural consensus modeling yielded information about numerous barriers to care, had a demonstrable effect on the translation of the kit, and was efficient when employed with coherent segments of a relatively homogeneous population and focused on a single condition.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 180 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Egypt 1 <1%
Unknown 179 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 29 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 16%
Researcher 19 11%
Student > Bachelor 19 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 9%
Other 23 13%
Unknown 46 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 58 32%
Social Sciences 23 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 19 11%
Medicine and Dentistry 16 9%
Arts and Humanities 3 2%
Other 9 5%
Unknown 52 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2023.
All research outputs
#3,355,566
of 25,654,806 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#1,414
of 5,484 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,634
of 275,226 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders
#28
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,654,806 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,484 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 275,226 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its contemporaries.