↓ Skip to main content

The therapeutic value of low-energy laser (LLLT) for enthesitis in children with juvenile spondyloarthropathies

Overview of attention for article published in Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2008
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
5 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
4 Mendeley
Title
The therapeutic value of low-energy laser (LLLT) for enthesitis in children with juvenile spondyloarthropathies
Published in
Pediatric Rheumatology, September 2008
DOI 10.1186/1546-0096-6-s1-p64
Authors

M Harjacek, T Kelava, L Lamot

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 4 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 4 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 25%
Researcher 1 25%
Student > Postgraduate 1 25%
Other 1 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2015.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Pediatric Rheumatology
#629
of 694 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#84,076
of 87,534 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pediatric Rheumatology
#8
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 694 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 87,534 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.