↓ Skip to main content

Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in Cancer Treatment Reviews, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
7 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
222 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
443 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Exercise and cancer rehabilitation: A systematic review
Published in
Cancer Treatment Reviews, December 2009
DOI 10.1016/j.ctrv.2009.11.003
Pubmed ID
Authors

Rosalind R. Spence, Kristiann C. Heesch, Wendy J. Brown

Abstract

Cancer is increasingly being viewed as a chronic illness requiring long-term management, and there is a growing need for evidence-based rehabilitation interventions for cancer survivors. Previous reviews have evaluated the benefits of exercise interventions for patients undergoing cancer treatment and long-term survivors, but none have investigated the role of exercise during cancer rehabilitation, the period immediately following cancer treatment completion. This systematic review summarises the literature on the health effects of exercise during cancer rehabilitation and evaluates the methodological rigour of studies in this area to date. Relevant studies were identified through a systematic search of PubMed and Embase to April 2009. Data on study design, recruitment strategy, participants, exercise intervention, adherence rates, and outcomes were extracted. Methodological rigour was assessed using a structured rating system. Ten studies were included. Breast cancer patients were the predominate patient group represented. Most interventions were aerobic or resistance-training exercise programmes, and exercise type, frequency, duration and intensity varied across studies. Improvements in physical functioning, strength, physical activity levels, quality of life, fatigue, immune function, haemoglobin concentrations, potential markers of recurrence, and body composition were reported. However, all studies were limited by incomplete reporting and methodological limitations. Although the methodological limitations of studies in this new field must be acknowledged, initial evidence indicates that exercise is feasible and may provide physiological and psychological benefits for cancer survivors during the rehabilitation period. Future studies with rigorous study designs are now required to advance the field.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 443 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Netherlands 2 <1%
Switzerland 2 <1%
United States 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Brazil 2 <1%
Colombia 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 430 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 68 15%
Student > Bachelor 65 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 54 12%
Researcher 45 10%
Other 35 8%
Other 109 25%
Unknown 67 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 122 28%
Sports and Recreations 80 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 54 12%
Psychology 41 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 14 3%
Other 52 12%
Unknown 80 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 03 November 2021.
All research outputs
#4,607,773
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Cancer Treatment Reviews
#362
of 1,532 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,753
of 176,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cancer Treatment Reviews
#4
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,532 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 176,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.