↓ Skip to main content

C5orf42 is the major gene responsible for OFD syndrome type VI

Overview of attention for article published in Human Genetics, November 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
77 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
C5orf42 is the major gene responsible for OFD syndrome type VI
Published in
Human Genetics, November 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00439-013-1385-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Estelle Lopez, Christel Thauvin-Robinet, Bruno Reversade, Nadia El Khartoufi, Louise Devisme, Muriel Holder, Hélène Ansart-Franquet, Magali Avila, Didier Lacombe, Pascale Kleinfinger, Irahara Kaori, Jun-Ichi Takanashi, Martine Le Merrer, Jelena Martinovic, Catherine Noël, Mohammad Shboul, Lena Ho, Yeliz Güven, Ferechté Razavi, Lydie Burglen, Nadège Gigot, Véronique Darmency-Stamboul, Julien Thevenon, Bernard Aral, Hülya Kayserili, Frédéric Huet, Stanislas Lyonnet, Cédric Le Caignec, Brunella Franco, Jean-Baptiste Rivière, Laurence Faivre, Tania Attié-Bitach

Abstract

Oral-facial-digital syndrome type VI (OFD VI) is a recessive ciliopathy defined by two diagnostic criteria: molar tooth sign (MTS) and one or more of the following: (1) tongue hamartoma (s) and/or additional frenula and/or upper lip notch; (2) mesoaxial polydactyly of one or more hands or feet; (3) hypothalamic hamartoma. Because of the MTS, OFD VI belongs to the "Joubert syndrome related disorders". Its genetic aetiology remains largely unknown although mutations in the TMEM216 gene, responsible for Joubert (JBS2) and Meckel-Gruber (MKS2) syndromes, have been reported in two OFD VI patients. To explore the molecular cause(s) of OFD VI syndrome, we used an exome sequencing strategy in six unrelated families followed by Sanger sequencing. We identified a total of 14 novel mutations in the C5orf42 gene in 9/11 families with positive OFD VI diagnostic criteria including a severe fetal case with microphthalmia, cerebellar hypoplasia, corpus callosum agenesis, polydactyly and skeletal dysplasia. C5orf42 mutations have already been reported in Joubert syndrome confirming that OFD VI and JBS are allelic disorders, thus enhancing our knowledge of the complex, highly heterogeneous nature of ciliopathies.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 77 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 1%
Netherlands 1 1%
Unknown 75 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 18%
Researcher 14 18%
Other 10 13%
Student > Master 7 9%
Professor 5 6%
Other 15 19%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 20 26%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 19 25%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 12%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Psychology 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 16 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2014.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Human Genetics
#2,816
of 2,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#186,194
of 213,742 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Human Genetics
#21
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,953 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 213,742 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.