↓ Skip to main content

Long-term hearing outcomes after gamma knife surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma with hearing preservation: evaluation in 92 patients with serial audiograms

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (59th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (69th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
34 Mendeley
Title
Long-term hearing outcomes after gamma knife surgery in patients with vestibular schwannoma with hearing preservation: evaluation in 92 patients with serial audiograms
Published in
Journal of Neuro-Oncology, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s11060-018-2784-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Toshinori Hasegawa, Takenori Kato, Takashi Yamamoto, Takehiro Naito, Naoki Kato, Jun Torii, Kazuki Ishii

Abstract

The treatment strategy for patients with vestibular schwannoma (VS) is controversial, and data concerning the long-term hearing outcomes > 5 years after gamma knife surgery (GKS) are limited. The long-term hearing outcomes after GKS were evaluated in VS patients with hearing preservation. Ninety-two VS patients with a pure tone average (PTA) ≤ 50 dB were evaluated. The median age was 54 years; the median tumor volume was 1.5 cm3. The tumors were treated with a median margin dose of 12 Gy and a median mean cochlear dose of 4.0 Gy. At the time of GKS, 65 patients retained a PTA of 0-30 dB, and 27 had a PTA of 31-50 dB. The median follow-up period was 106 months. At the final follow-up, 2 (2%) developed tumor progression. During the median audiogram follow-up of 83 months, the PTA was ≤ 30 dB in 22 patients (24%) and 31-50 dB in 27 patients (29%); 43 patients (47%) worsened to a PTA > 50 dB. Hearing preservation rates were 66, 57, and 44% at 3, 5, and 10 years, respectively. In multivariate analysis, the mean cochlear dose (P < 0.001) and pre-GKS PTA (P = 0.045) were significant for hearing preservation. GKS was an effective treatment option for VS patients with a PTA ≤ 50 dB. As a lower cochlear dose and better pre-GKS PTA contributed to long-term hearing preservation, prophylactic GKS before hearing deterioration or tumor growth would be a treatment of choice if patients provided informed consent.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 34 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 34 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 7 21%
Student > Bachelor 4 12%
Other 3 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Student > Master 3 9%
Other 7 21%
Unknown 7 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 53%
Engineering 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 10 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 January 2019.
All research outputs
#7,496,646
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#1,046
of 2,989 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#129,977
of 327,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neuro-Oncology
#28
of 93 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,989 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 93 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.