↓ Skip to main content

Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy.

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Neurosurgery, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Concurrent use of the Pipeline Embolization Device and coils for intracranial aneurysms: technique, safety, and efficacy.
Published in
Journal of Neurosurgery, February 2015
DOI 10.3171/2014.12.jns141259
Pubmed ID
Authors

Erez Nossek, David J. Chalif, Shamik Chakraborty, Kim Lombardo, Karen S. Black, Avi Setton

Abstract

OBJECT The use of the Pipeline Embolization Device (PED) as a sole endovascular modality has been described for the treatment of brain aneurysms. The benefit of using coils concurrently with a limited number of PEDs is not well documented. The authors describe their experience with this technique as well as their midterm clinical and angiographic results. METHODS This is a retrospective review of patients treated between 2011 and 2014. The authors placed a minimal number of PEDs with the addition of coils using a "jailed" microcatheter technique. A partially dense coil mass was obtained. Immediate and midterm clinical and angiographic results are reviewed. RESULTS The authors treated 27 patients harboring 28 aneurysms using this technique. The mean aneurysm size was 11.9 mm, and the mean neck size was 5.4 mm. A mean of 1.48 PEDs were placed per patient, and a mean of 1.33 PEDs per aneurysm were placed. The Raymond score immediately after PED placement was 2 or 3 in 82.1% of the patients. There were no intraprocedural or postprocedural complications. All PEDs were successfully deployed. No clinical or technical adverse effects related to the coil mass were observed. There were no clinical or radiographic signs of ischemia in this group. At follow-up imaging, complete aneurysm occlusion was demonstrated on the first MR angiogram (3-5 months) in all patients who reached this milestone. Follow-up digital subtraction angiography (5-13 months) confirmed complete occlusion in all patients who reached this milestone. All patients maintained their baseline clinical status. CONCLUSIONS The deployment of PEDs with concurrent partially dense coiling is safe and efficacious. This technique achieved early complete occlusion and endovascular reconstruction of the parent vessel, without inducing mass effect. Favorable midterm clinical results were observed in all patients.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Canada 1 3%
Unknown 35 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 7 19%
Other 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Ph. D. Student 2 6%
Other 8 22%
Unknown 8 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 50%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Psychology 1 3%
Computer Science 1 3%
Sports and Recreations 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 12 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,660,571
of 25,377,790 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurosurgery
#6,098
of 6,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#268,862
of 360,829 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurosurgery
#66
of 83 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,377,790 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,769 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 360,829 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 83 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.