| Title |
Interactions between respiration and systemic hemodynamics. Part I: basic concepts
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, September 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-008-1297-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
François Feihl, Alain F. Broccard |
| Abstract |
The topic of cardiorespiratory interactions is of extreme importance to the practicing intensivist. It also has a reputation for being intellectually challenging, due in part to the enormous volume of relevant, at times contradictory literature. Another source of difficulty is the need to simultaneously consider the interrelated functioning of several organ systems (not necessarily limited to the heart and lung), in other words, to adopt a systemic (as opposed to analytic) point of view. We believe that the proper understanding of a few simple physiological concepts is of great help in organizing knowledge in this field. The first part of this review will be devoted to demonstrating this point. The second part, to be published in a coming issue of Intensive Care Medicine, will apply these concepts to clinical situations. We hope that this text will be of some use, especially to intensivists in training, to demystify a field that many find intimidating. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 2% |
| Switzerland | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 2% |
| Unknown | 195 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 42 | 20% |
| Other | 35 | 16% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 30 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 21 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 8% |
| Other | 47 | 22% |
| Unknown | 22 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 168 | 79% |
| Engineering | 5 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 1% |
| Computer Science | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 7 | 3% |
| Unknown | 24 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,781,147
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,021
of 4,974 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#14,048
of 88,780 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#4
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,974 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 88,780 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.