↓ Skip to main content

Serum Helicobacter pylori CagA antibody may not be used as a tumor marker for diagnosing gastric cancer in east Asian countries

Overview of attention for article published in Tumor Biology, August 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
9 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
22 Mendeley
Title
Serum Helicobacter pylori CagA antibody may not be used as a tumor marker for diagnosing gastric cancer in east Asian countries
Published in
Tumor Biology, August 2014
DOI 10.1007/s13277-014-2530-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Zhicheng Zhao, Yuhong Li, Shengxin Liu, Weihua Fu

Abstract

Gastric cancer (GC) is a highly malignant cancer with increasing incidence and mortality worldwide. Serum Helicobacter pylori CagA antibody has been widely reported to play an important role in diagnosing GC. However, published data on this subject are inconclusive. Therefore, we performed a meta-analysis to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of serum H. pylori CagA antibody in the diagnosis of GC. We conducted a comprehensive search to identify eligible related studies, in which the pooled sensitivity, specificity, diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and summary receiver operating characteristic (SROC) curves could be determined. A total of 12 studies including 1,524 cases and 3,324 controls who fulfilled all of the inclusion criteria were included for analysis. The summary estimates for serum H. pylori CagA antibody in the diagnosis of GC in these studies were pooled sensitivity 0.71 (95 % CI 0.69-0.73), specificity 0.40 (95 % CI 0.39-0.42), DOR 2.11 (95 % CI 1.55-2.8), and the area under the curve was 0.636. Our meta-analysis showed that serum H. pylori CagA antibody should not be used for detecting GC.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 22 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 22 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 18%
Researcher 3 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 14%
Lecturer 2 9%
Other 2 9%
Other 4 18%
Unknown 4 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 8 36%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 14%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 5%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 5%
Psychology 1 5%
Other 1 5%
Unknown 7 32%