| Title |
Using the intervention mapping protocol to develop a community-based intervention for the prevention of childhood obesity in a multi-centre European project: the IDEFICS intervention
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, August 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1479-5868-8-82 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Vera Verbestel, Stefaan De Henauw, Lea Maes, Leen Haerens, Staffan Mårild, Gabriele Eiben, Lauren Lissner, Luis A Moreno, Natalia Lascorz Frauca, Gianvincenzo Barba, Éva Kovács, Kenn Konstabel, Michael Tornaritis, Katharina Gallois, Holger Hassel, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij |
| Abstract |
The prevalence of childhood obesity has increased during the past decades and is now considered an urgent public health problem. Although stabilizing trends in obesity prevalence have been identified in parts of Europe, preventive efforts in children are still needed. Using the socio-ecological approach as the underlying theoretical perspective, the IDEFICS project aimed to develop, implement and evaluate a community-based intervention for the prevention of childhood obesity in eight European countries. The aim of the present manuscript was to describe the content and developmental process of the IDEFICS intervention. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 5 | 2% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| India | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 258 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 49 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 25 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 19 | 7% |
| Other | 50 | 19% |
| Unknown | 57 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 19% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 40 | 15% |
| Social Sciences | 31 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 21 | 8% |
| Psychology | 20 | 7% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 75 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 September 2011.
All research outputs
#20,655,488
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#2,034
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,324
of 130,321 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#20
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 130,321 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.