| Title |
The Classic: Treatment of Malum Coxae Senilis, Old Slipped Upper Femoral Epiphysis, Intrapelvic Protrusion of the Acetabulum, and Coxa Plana by Means of Acetabuloplasty
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, December 2008
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11999-008-0670-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marius Nygaard Smith-Petersen |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 10% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 10% |
| Australia | 1 | 10% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 10% |
| Denmark | 1 | 10% |
| Sweden | 1 | 10% |
| Spain | 1 | 10% |
| Unknown | 3 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 5 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 4 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Italy | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 14 | 15% |
| Other | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 11 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 9% |
| Other | 26 | 27% |
| Unknown | 13 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 52 | 55% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 5 | 5% |
| Unknown | 21 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2022.
All research outputs
#4,102,121
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#877
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,821
of 173,147 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#11
of 42 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 173,147 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 42 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.