You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reconstruction of Cyclooxygenase Evolution in Animals Suggests Variable, Lineage-Specific Duplications, and Homologs with Low Sequence Identity
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Molecular Evolution, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00239-015-9670-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Justin C. Havird, Kevin M. Kocot, Pamela M. Brannock, Johanna T. Cannon, Damien S. Waits, David A. Weese, Scott R. Santos, Kenneth M. Halanych |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 3 | 75% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Scientists | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 3% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 36 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 6 | 15% |
| Professor | 5 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 4 | 10% |
| Unknown | 10 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 10 | 26% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 26% |
| Environmental Science | 3 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 2 | 5% |
| Other | 3 | 8% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 October 2019.
All research outputs
#12,725,419
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#1,021
of 1,438 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,791
of 259,193 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Molecular Evolution
#8
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,438 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.2. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 259,193 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.