You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effects of maintenance schedules following pulmonary rehabilitation in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMJ Open, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005921 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Andrew M Wilson, Paula Browne, Sandra Olive, Allan Clark, Penny Galey, Emma Dix, Helene Woodhouse, Sue Robinson, Edward C F Wilson, Lindi Staunton |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 27 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 10 | 37% |
| Australia | 3 | 11% |
| United States | 2 | 7% |
| Singapore | 1 | 4% |
| Israel | 1 | 4% |
| Sao Tome and Principe | 1 | 4% |
| Ireland | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 8 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 41% |
| Scientists | 8 | 30% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 6 | 22% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 277 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 28 | 10% |
| Researcher | 27 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 24 | 9% |
| Other | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 54 | 19% |
| Unknown | 70 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 67 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 44 | 16% |
| Psychology | 18 | 6% |
| Sports and Recreations | 17 | 6% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 10 | 4% |
| Other | 26 | 9% |
| Unknown | 95 | 34% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 May 2015.
All research outputs
#1,308,365
of 24,873,243 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#2,409
of 24,912 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#16,433
of 264,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#33
of 265 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,873,243 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 24,912 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 265 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.