↓ Skip to main content

Patterns of co-occurring non-verbal behaviour and self-directed speech; a comparison of three methodological approaches

Overview of attention for article published in Metacognition and Learning, October 2013
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
3 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Patterns of co-occurring non-verbal behaviour and self-directed speech; a comparison of three methodological approaches
Published in
Metacognition and Learning, October 2013
DOI 10.1007/s11409-013-9106-7
Authors

Martina Kuvalja, Mohini Verma, David Whitebread

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 89 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 17 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 16 18%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Student > Bachelor 6 7%
Researcher 6 7%
Other 13 14%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 25 27%
Social Sciences 19 21%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 9 10%
Unknown 31 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 January 2017.
All research outputs
#18,756,367
of 23,911,072 outputs
Outputs from Metacognition and Learning
#183
of 230 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#154,976
of 216,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Metacognition and Learning
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,911,072 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 230 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 216,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 24th percentile – i.e., 24% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them