↓ Skip to main content

Validation and Optimization of BIANCA for the Segmentation of Extensive White Matter Hyperintensities

Overview of attention for article published in Neuroinformatics, March 2018
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Validation and Optimization of BIANCA for the Segmentation of Extensive White Matter Hyperintensities
Published in
Neuroinformatics, March 2018
DOI 10.1007/s12021-018-9372-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yifeng Ling, Eric Jouvent, Louis Cousyn, Hugues Chabriat, François De Guio

Abstract

White matter hyperintensities (WMH) are a hallmark of small vessel diseases (SVD). Yet, no automated segmentation method is readily and widely used, especially in patients with extensive WMH where lesions are close to the cerebral cortex. BIANCA (Brain Intensity AbNormality Classification Algorithm) is a new fully automated, supervised method for WMH segmentation. In this study, we optimized and compared BIANCA against a reference method with manual editing in a cohort of patients with extensive WMH. This was achieved in two datasets: a clinical protocol with 90 patients having 2-dimensional FLAIR and an advanced protocol with 66 patients having 3-dimensional FLAIR. We first determined simultaneously which input modalities (FLAIR alone or FLAIR + T1) and which training sets were better compared to the reference. Three strategies for the selection of the threshold that is applied to the probabilistic output of BIANCA were then evaluated: chosen at the group level, based on Fazekas score or determined individually. Accuracy of the segmentation was assessed through measures of spatial agreement and volumetric correspondence with respect to reference segmentation. Based on all our tests, we identified multimodal inputs (FLAIR + T1), mixed WMH load training set and individual threshold selection as the best conditions to automatically segment WMH in our cohort. A median Dice similarity index of 0.80 (0.80) and an intraclass correlation coefficient of 0.97 (0.98) were obtained for the clinical (advanced) protocol. However, Bland-Altman plots identified a difference with the reference method that was linearly related to the total burden of WMH. Our results suggest that BIANCA is a reliable and fast segmentation method to extract masks of WMH in patients with extensive lesions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 51 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Researcher 6 12%
Student > Master 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 3 6%
Other 5 10%
Unknown 19 37%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 11 22%
Neuroscience 8 16%
Psychology 2 4%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 1 2%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 24 47%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#18,603,172
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Neuroinformatics
#323
of 407 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#256,292
of 329,891 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Neuroinformatics
#12
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 407 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,891 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.