↓ Skip to main content

Priority setting by sites and by species using rarity, richness and phylogenetic diversity: the case of neotropical glassfrogs (Anura: Centrolenidae)

Overview of attention for article published in Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Priority setting by sites and by species using rarity, richness and phylogenetic diversity: the case of neotropical glassfrogs (Anura: Centrolenidae)
Published in
Biodiversity and Conservation, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s10531-014-0642-5
Authors

Angela María Mendoza, Héctor T. Arita

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 3 4%
Spain 2 2%
Indonesia 1 1%
France 1 1%
Switzerland 1 1%
United Kingdom 1 1%
Colombia 1 1%
Mexico 1 1%
Japan 1 1%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 72 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 17%
Student > Master 12 14%
Researcher 11 13%
Student > Bachelor 10 12%
Professor 7 8%
Other 21 25%
Unknown 9 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 40 48%
Environmental Science 21 25%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 5 6%
Unspecified 1 1%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 1%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 13 15%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,358,731
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2,213
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#280,229
of 320,414 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#39
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 320,414 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.