You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A multicenter study on the effect of continuous hemodiafiltration intensity on antibiotic pharmacokinetics
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, December 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13054-015-0818-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darren M Roberts, Xin Liu, Jason A Roberts, Priya Nair, Louise Cole, Michael S Roberts, Jeffrey Lipman, Rinaldo Bellomo |
| Abstract |
Continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) may alter antibiotic pharmacokinetics and increase the risk of incorrect dosing. In a nested cohort within a large randomized controlled trial, we assessed the effect of higher (40 mL/kg/hour) and lower (25 mL/kg/hour) intensity CRRT on antibiotic pharmacokinetics. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Puerto Rico | 2 | 17% |
| France | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 8 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 6 | 50% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 120 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 114 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 15% |
| Researcher | 17 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 10 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 9 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 23% |
| Unknown | 30 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 51 | 43% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 13 | 11% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 10 | 8% |
| Unknown | 37 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2015.
All research outputs
#4,697,581
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#3,091
of 6,047 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,717
of 387,363 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#378
of 575 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 76th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,047 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 19.2. This one is in the 47th percentile – i.e., 47% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 387,363 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 575 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.