↓ Skip to main content

Evidence-based diuretics: focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide

Overview of attention for article published in Future Cardiology, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
44 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Evidence-based diuretics: focus on chlorthalidone and indapamide
Published in
Future Cardiology, March 2015
DOI 10.2217/fca.14.83
Pubmed ID
Authors

James J DiNicolantonio, Jaikrit Bhutani, Carl J Lavie, James H O'Keefe

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 44 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 44 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 6 14%
Researcher 5 11%
Student > Master 4 9%
Other 3 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 17 39%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 13 30%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 6 14%
Chemistry 2 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Chemical Engineering 1 2%
Other 1 2%
Unknown 19 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 October 2022.
All research outputs
#7,155,167
of 25,393,528 outputs
Outputs from Future Cardiology
#102
of 623 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,163
of 271,034 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Future Cardiology
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,393,528 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 623 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 271,034 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.