| Title |
Does removal of invasives restore ecological networks? An experimental approach
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Invasions, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10530-015-0866-7 |
| Authors |
Amanda D. Rodewald, Rudolf P. Rohr, Miguel A. Fortuna, Jordi Bascompte |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 29% |
| United Kingdom | 3 | 21% |
| Spain | 2 | 14% |
| Comoros | 1 | 7% |
| Guinea | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 21% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 79% |
| Scientists | 3 | 21% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 2 | 1% |
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Finland | 1 | <1% |
| Tanzania, United Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| South Africa | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 145 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 38 | 24% |
| Researcher | 31 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 20 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 7 | 4% |
| Other | 24 | 15% |
| Unknown | 25 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 80 | 50% |
| Environmental Science | 37 | 23% |
| Psychology | 2 | 1% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | <1% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | 1% |
| Unknown | 36 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 June 2015.
All research outputs
#4,440,406
of 24,798,538 outputs
Outputs from Biological Invasions
#651
of 2,482 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#51,306
of 264,142 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Invasions
#11
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,798,538 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,482 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 264,142 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.