| Title |
Increased gut microbiota diversity and abundance of Faecalibacterium prausnitzii and Akkermansia after fasting: a pilot study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Acta Medica Austriaca, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00508-015-0755-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marlene Remely, Berit Hippe, Isabella Geretschlaeger, Sonja Stegmayer, Ingrid Hoefinger, Alexander Haslberger |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 20% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 13% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Spain | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 6 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 7% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 7% |
| Scientists | 1 | 7% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 257 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 256 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 41 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 35 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 8% |
| Other | 38 | 15% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 19% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 16% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 33 | 13% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 19 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 12 | 5% |
| Other | 32 | 12% |
| Unknown | 69 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 16. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,275,143
of 25,729,842 outputs
Outputs from Acta Medica Austriaca
#65
of 975 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,120
of 277,437 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Acta Medica Austriaca
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,729,842 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 975 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 277,437 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.