↓ Skip to main content

Disability after clinical fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone density: the fracture intervention trial (FIT)

Overview of attention for article published in Osteoporosis International, January 2003
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
129 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Disability after clinical fracture in postmenopausal women with low bone density: the fracture intervention trial (FIT)
Published in
Osteoporosis International, January 2003
DOI 10.1007/s00198-002-1314-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

H.A. Fink, K.E. Ensrud, D.B. Nelson, R.P. Kerani(formerly Pieper), P.J. Schreiner, Y. Zhao, S.R. Cummings, M.C. Nevitt

Abstract

Relatively little is known about outcomes following clinical osteoporotic fractures at nonhip, nonvertebral skeletal sites. To address this issue, we prospectively assessed post-fracture disability at multiple skeletal sites in a population of 909 older (aged 55-81 years), community-dwelling women with low femoral neck bone mineral density who had experienced a fracture while enrolled in the Fracture Intervention Trial (FIT). FIT is a randomized, double-masked, placebo-controlled trial that was designed to determine the effect of alendronate on fracture incidence, and the current study was conducted as a secondary analysis of FIT data. Following incident clinical fractures, FIT participants were followed prospectively for assessment of site-specific, fracture-related disability. Measures of disability were self-reported days hospitalized or confined to bed because of the fracture ('bed days') and days of reduced usual activities because of the fracture ('limited activity days'). Of fracture types evaluated, those of the hip resulted in the highest percentage of subjects with any bed days or limited activity days after fracture (94% with any bed days and 100% with any limited activity days), though the mean number of bed days and limited activity days appeared highest after lumbar vertebral fractures (25.8 mean bed days and 158.5 mean limited activity days). Substantial disability also was reported after fractures of thoracic vertebrae, humerus, distal forearm, ankle and foot. Within fracture types, post-fracture disability was highly variable, ranging from none to more than 6 months.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 11 12%
Researcher 9 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 7 8%
Other 19 21%
Unknown 26 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 34%
Social Sciences 6 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 3%
Computer Science 2 2%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 31 35%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 June 2021.
All research outputs
#7,508,670
of 22,931,367 outputs
Outputs from Osteoporosis International
#1,351
of 3,626 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,642
of 129,533 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Osteoporosis International
#3
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,931,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,626 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 129,533 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.