↓ Skip to main content

Effects of inorganic nitrate and beetroot supplementation on endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Nutrition, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (83rd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
121 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
158 Mendeley
Title
Effects of inorganic nitrate and beetroot supplementation on endothelial function: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Published in
European Journal of Nutrition, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s00394-015-0872-7
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jose Lara, Ammar W. Ashor, C. Oggioni, A. Ahluwalia, John C. Mathers, Mario Siervo

Abstract

Diets rich in inorganic nitrate are associated with lower blood pressure, an effect that may be mediated by an improvement of endothelial function (EF). Therefore, a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials (RCTs) were conducted to examine the effects of inorganic nitrate and beetroot supplementation on measures of EF.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 158 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 157 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 23 15%
Student > Bachelor 23 15%
Student > Master 21 13%
Researcher 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 8%
Other 30 19%
Unknown 37 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 34 22%
Nursing and Health Professions 21 13%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 12%
Sports and Recreations 18 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 8 5%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 40 25%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,580,123
of 25,307,332 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Nutrition
#806
of 2,587 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#43,329
of 267,762 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Nutrition
#16
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,307,332 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,587 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 25.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 267,762 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.