| Title |
Impact of anthropogenic drivers on subaqueous topographical change in the Datong to Xuliujing reach of the Yangtze River
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Science China Earth Sciences, April 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11430-017-9169-4 |
| Authors |
Shuwei Zheng, Heqin Cheng, Shengyu Shi, Wei Xu, Quanping Zhou, Yuehua Jiang, Fengnian Zhou, Minxiong Cao |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 11 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 11 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Lecturer | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 18% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 4 | 36% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 1 | 9% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 9% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 9% |
| Engineering | 1 | 9% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 3 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 April 2018.
All research outputs
#3,203,383
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Science China Earth Sciences
#178
of 431 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#64,860
of 332,734 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Science China Earth Sciences
#8
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 431 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 332,734 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.