↓ Skip to main content

Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2013
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
16 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
91 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
361 Mendeley
Title
Molecular mechanisms of CRISPR-mediated microbial immunity
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, August 2013
DOI 10.1007/s00018-013-1438-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Giedrius Gasiunas, Tomas Sinkunas, Virginijus Siksnys

Abstract

Bacteriophages (phages) infect bacteria in order to replicate and burst out of the host, killing the cell, when reproduction is completed. Thus, from a bacterial perspective, phages pose a persistent lethal threat to bacterial populations. Not surprisingly, bacteria evolved multiple defense barriers to interfere with nearly every step of phage life cycles. Phages respond to this selection pressure by counter-evolving their genomes to evade bacterial resistance. The antagonistic interaction between bacteria and rapidly diversifying viruses promotes the evolution and dissemination of bacteriophage-resistance mechanisms in bacteria. Recently, an adaptive microbial immune system, named clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats (CRISPR) and which provides acquired immunity against viruses and plasmids, has been identified. Unlike the restriction–modification anti-phage barrier that subjects to cleavage any foreign DNA lacking a protective methyl-tag in the target site, the CRISPR–Cas systems are invader-specific, adaptive, and heritable. In this review, we focus on the molecular mechanisms of interference/immunity provided by different CRISPR–Cas systems.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 361 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 5 1%
Germany 2 <1%
Spain 2 <1%
Switzerland 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Lithuania 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
Belgium 1 <1%
Other 3 <1%
Unknown 343 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 72 20%
Student > Master 67 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 58 16%
Student > Bachelor 55 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 18 5%
Other 48 13%
Unknown 43 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 156 43%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 95 26%
Immunology and Microbiology 17 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 10 3%
Computer Science 8 2%
Other 23 6%
Unknown 52 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 September 2023.
All research outputs
#3,297,540
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#506
of 4,151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#28,856
of 200,539 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1
of 24 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 200,539 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 24 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.