↓ Skip to main content

Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (97th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page
wikipedia
3 Wikipedia pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
110 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
61 Mendeley
Title
Debunking evolutionary debunking of ethical realism
Published in
Philosophical Studies, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0295-y
Authors

William J. FitzPatrick

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 61 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Israel 1 2%
Unknown 60 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 20%
Student > Master 12 20%
Student > Bachelor 6 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 8%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 16 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 28 46%
Psychology 5 8%
Social Sciences 3 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 3%
Computer Science 2 3%
Other 7 11%
Unknown 14 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 11 April 2024.
All research outputs
#7,044,921
of 25,698,912 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#208
of 1,451 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,307
of 240,544 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#1
of 36 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,698,912 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,451 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,544 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 36 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.