↓ Skip to main content

Pulmonary Embolism Following Incomplete Surgical Resection of a Right Ventricular Myxoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature

Overview of attention for article published in Cardiology and Therapy, April 2018
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
10 Mendeley
Title
Pulmonary Embolism Following Incomplete Surgical Resection of a Right Ventricular Myxoma: A Case Report and Review of the Literature
Published in
Cardiology and Therapy, April 2018
DOI 10.1007/s40119-018-0109-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yazan Assaf, Maher Nasser, Hani Jneid, David Ott

Abstract

Right ventricular (RV) myxomas are extremely rare, but may have dreadful clinical sequelae including pulmonary embolism (PE). We present a case of a patient who had an RV myxoma that was attached to the tricuspid valve, and therefore could not be resected completely during surgery, and remnants of the tumor were seen on transthoracic echocardiogram during post-operative follow-up. Five months after surgery, the patient had PE, which could be due to tumor emboli or thromboemboli. Since repeat surgical resection was not feasible, the patient was started on warfarin. The patient is doing well and has had no PE recurrence over the past 20 months of follow-up. We have complemented the current case report with a comprehensive literature search and review on RV myxomas associated with PE in order to shed light on this uncommon but potentially lethal disorder. We concluded that right-sided cardiac myxomas, including RV myxomas, should be considered while dealing with PE, particularly in young patients with no risk factors, and that follow-up with echocardiography after surgery is important due to the possibility of recurrence, especially if complete resection was difficult to perform. Plain language summary available for this article.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 10 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 10 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 2 20%
Researcher 1 10%
Student > Bachelor 1 10%
Other 1 10%
Student > Master 1 10%
Other 0 0%
Unknown 4 40%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 40%
Social Sciences 1 10%
Unknown 5 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 April 2018.
All research outputs
#14,104,945
of 23,043,346 outputs
Outputs from Cardiology and Therapy
#90
of 271 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#179,164
of 327,033 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cardiology and Therapy
#4
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,043,346 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 271 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 327,033 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.