| Title |
Telephone, print, and Web-based interventions for physical activity, diet, and weight control among cancer survivors: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Cancer Survivorship, March 2015
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s11764-015-0442-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana D. Goode, Sheleigh P. Lawler, Charlotte L. Brakenridge, Marina M. Reeves, Elizabeth G. Eakin |
| Abstract |
Broad-reach (non-face-to-face) modalities offer an accessible and cost-effective means to provide behavior change programs in diverse and growing cancer survivor populations. The purpose of this systematic review is to evaluate the efficacy of physical activity, dietary, and/or weight control interventions for cancer survivors in which telephone, short-message service, print, and/or Web is the primary method of delivery. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 29% |
| United States | 3 | 21% |
| Australia | 1 | 7% |
| Italy | 1 | 7% |
| Canada | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 57% |
| Scientists | 4 | 29% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 264 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 263 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 40 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 14% |
| Researcher | 32 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 23 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 17 | 6% |
| Other | 56 | 21% |
| Unknown | 59 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 47 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 43 | 16% |
| Psychology | 26 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 15 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 43 | 16% |
| Unknown | 76 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 October 2020.
All research outputs
#2,427,979
of 25,205,864 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#168
of 1,144 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,679
of 265,230 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cancer Survivorship
#3
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,205,864 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,144 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 265,230 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.