| Title |
ISCEV Standard for full-field clinical electroretinography (2015 update)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Documenta Ophthalmologica, December 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10633-014-9473-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daphne L. McCulloch, Michael F. Marmor, Mitchell G. Brigell, Ruth Hamilton, Graham E. Holder, Radouil Tzekov, Michael Bach |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 67% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 506 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 2 | <1% |
| Tunisia | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 501 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 72 | 14% |
| Researcher | 68 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 54 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 48 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 35 | 7% |
| Other | 98 | 19% |
| Unknown | 131 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 162 | 32% |
| Neuroscience | 57 | 11% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 26 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 25 | 5% |
| Engineering | 21 | 4% |
| Other | 63 | 12% |
| Unknown | 152 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 February 2024.
All research outputs
#4,700,145
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#21
of 498 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,460
of 364,893 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Documenta Ophthalmologica
#1
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 498 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 364,893 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.