↓ Skip to main content

Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk

Overview of attention for article published in Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (90th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (94th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
1 news outlet
twitter
11 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Citations

dimensions_citation
193 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
164 Mendeley
Title
Anterior and Anterolateral Approaches for THA Are Associated With Lower Dislocation Risk Without Higher Revision Risk
Published in
Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s11999-015-4230-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dhiren Sheth, Guy Cafri, Maria C. S. Inacio, Elizabeth W. Paxton, Robert S. Namba

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 164 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Japan 1 <1%
Unknown 163 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 25 15%
Researcher 22 13%
Other 18 11%
Student > Bachelor 17 10%
Student > Master 13 8%
Other 30 18%
Unknown 39 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 79 48%
Engineering 6 4%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 3%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 2%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 2%
Other 13 8%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 16 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,060,536
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#274
of 7,298 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,735
of 274,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Orthopaedics & Related Research
#7
of 133 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,298 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 274,386 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 133 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.