↓ Skip to main content

Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in diastolic and systolic phase

Overview of attention for article published in The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
22 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Myocardial T1 and T2 mapping in diastolic and systolic phase
Published in
The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, March 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10554-015-0639-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Carlo Tessa, Stefano Diciotti, Nicholas Landini, Alessio Lilli, Jacopo Del Meglio, Luca Salvatori, Marco Giannelli, Andreas Greiser, Claudio Vignali, Giancarlo Casolo

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the regional (i.e. myocardial segments) variability as well as the overall image quality of cardiac T1 and T2 maps obtained in diastole and in systole. In 22 healthy subjects (group-1), diastolic T1 and T2 maps were obtained at 1.5T in short-axis view at basal, mid-ventricular and apical level, as well as in 4-chamber (4ch) and in 2-chamber (2ch) views. In another group of 25 patients (group-2), the maps were obtained in both diastole and systole. In the group-1, 15.4 % of myocardial segments in T1 maps and 0.8 % of myocardial segments in T2 maps, mainly located at apical level, showed relevant artifacts and/or partial-volume effect and had to be discarded. We found no significant difference in T1 values among basal, mid-ventricular and apical segments. T2 values at apical level were significantly higher than at basal and mid-ventricular level (short-axis, p < 0.0001; 4ch, p < 0.009; 2ch, p = 0.0002 at ANOVA tests). In the group-2, 21.1 %/5.3 % and 4.0 %/0.8 % of segments showed relevant artifacts in diastolic/systolic T1 and T2 maps, respectively. Apical T2 values were significantly lower in systole than in diastole. In systole, there were no significant differences in T1/T2 among basal, mid-ventricular and apical segments. The overall quality of T1 and T2 maps drops in apical segments. This could be problematic when evaluating focal myocardial changes. The acquisition in systole increases the number of evaluable segments.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 3%
France 1 3%
Unknown 31 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 10 30%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 21%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Lecturer 2 6%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 2 6%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 18 55%
Engineering 7 21%
Computer Science 1 3%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 3%
Energy 1 3%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 4 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#22,758,309
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#1,460
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#237,668
of 276,649 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The International Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging
#32
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.3. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 276,649 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.