↓ Skip to main content

Filter material treatment methods for fine dust removal and consistent regeneration

Overview of attention for article published in Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, May 2012
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
1 Mendeley
Title
Filter material treatment methods for fine dust removal and consistent regeneration
Published in
Chemical and Petroleum Engineering, May 2012
DOI 10.1007/s10556-012-9572-9
Authors

S. Yu. Panov, E. V. Arkhangelskaya, Yu. V. Krasovitskii, Z. S. Gasanov

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 1 Mendeley reader of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 1 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Postgraduate 1 100%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Chemical Engineering 1 100%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2014.
All research outputs
#21,697,638
of 24,217,893 outputs
Outputs from Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
#69
of 71 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#152,229
of 167,870 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemical and Petroleum Engineering
#3
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,217,893 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 71 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.1. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 167,870 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.