| Title |
Rediscovery of the ‘extinct’ Lord Howe Island stick-insect (Dryococelus australis (Montrouzier)) (Phasmatodea) and recommendations for its conservation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, July 2003
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1023625710011 |
| Authors |
David Priddel, Nicholas Carlile, Margaret Humphrey, Stephen Fellenberg, Dean Hiscox |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Honduras | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 2% |
| Saint Kitts and Nevis | 1 | 1% |
| Austria | 1 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | 1% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 90% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 18 | 20% |
| Student > Master | 17 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 14% |
| Researcher | 9 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Unknown | 15 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 50 | 56% |
| Environmental Science | 13 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 2% |
| Unknown | 17 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 54. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 31 January 2024.
All research outputs
#783,710
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#82
of 2,422 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#680
of 52,456 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,422 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 52,456 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them