↓ Skip to main content

Lead Contamination in American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) from Wisconsin

Overview of attention for article published in Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, August 2005
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
38 Mendeley
Title
Lead Contamination in American Woodcock (Scolopax minor) from Wisconsin
Published in
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology, August 2005
DOI 10.1007/s00244-005-7063-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

S.M. Strom, K.A. Patnode, J.A. Langenberg, B.L. Bodenstein, A.M. Scheuhammer

Abstract

An initial survey of lead levels in American woodcock (Scolopax minor) from Wisconsin was conducted in 1998 using wing bones from hunter-donated woodcock. The results of this initial survey indicated that young-of-year woodcock were accumulating extremely high levels of lead in their bones. Similar collections were made (using steel shot) between 1999 and 2001. The combined results of this collection indicated that 43.4% of young-of-year woodcock (range 1.5-220.0 microg/g dry wt) and 70% of woodcock chicks (range 9.6-93.0 microg/g dry wt) had bone lead levels in the elevated range (>20 microg/g dry wt). Blood samples were collected from chicks at a site considered elevated based on bone lead results (Mead Wildlife Area) and a site considered background (Navarino Wildlife Area). These samples were analyzed for lead concentration and aminolevulinic acid dehydratase activity. The mean blood lead concentrations of woodcock chicks from both sites did not reach levels that are considered elevated in waterfowl (>0.200 microg/ml). However, blood lead concentrations of chicks from the Mead Wildlife Area were significantly higher than lead levels in chicks from Navarino Wildlife Area (p = 0.002). Although the ultimate sources of lead exposure for Wisconsin woodcock currently remain unidentified, anthropogenic sources cannot be ruled out. Our results indicate that elevated lead exposure in Wisconsin woodcock is common and begins shortly after hatch.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 38 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 5%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Sweden 1 3%
Poland 1 3%
Unknown 33 87%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 16%
Other 6 16%
Researcher 6 16%
Student > Master 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 8%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 9 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 13 34%
Environmental Science 9 24%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 5%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 5%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 1 3%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 8 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#14,279,231
of 24,373,273 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#1,423
of 2,182 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#52,776
of 60,865 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
#6
of 6 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,373,273 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,182 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 60,865 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 6 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.