↓ Skip to main content

Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development

Overview of attention for article published in The Annals of Regional Science, January 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
Title
Neoclassical theory versus new economic geography: competing explanations of cross-regional variation in economic development
Published in
The Annals of Regional Science, January 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00168-008-0278-z
Authors

Bernard Fingleton, Manfred M. Fischer

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Portugal 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Chile 1 1%
New Zealand 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Unknown 71 93%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 28%
Student > Master 12 16%
Student > Bachelor 7 9%
Researcher 6 8%
Student > Postgraduate 4 5%
Other 14 18%
Unknown 12 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 34 45%
Social Sciences 13 17%
Environmental Science 4 5%
Business, Management and Accounting 3 4%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 3%
Other 6 8%
Unknown 14 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2015.
All research outputs
#7,591,533
of 23,794,258 outputs
Outputs from The Annals of Regional Science
#119
of 368 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#49,895
of 175,042 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Annals of Regional Science
#5
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,794,258 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 368 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 175,042 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 2 of them.