↓ Skip to main content

Changes in postural activity of the trunk muscles following spinal manipulative therapy

Overview of attention for article published in Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, April 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
206 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Changes in postural activity of the trunk muscles following spinal manipulative therapy
Published in
Musculoskeletal Science and Practice, April 2007
DOI 10.1016/j.math.2006.06.015
Pubmed ID
Authors

Manuela L. Ferreira, Paulo H. Ferreira, Paul W. Hodges

Abstract

Spinal manipulative therapy (SMT) is common in the management of low back pain (LBP) and has been associated with changes in muscle activity, but evidence is conflicting. This study investigated the effect of SMT on trunk muscle activity in postural tasks in people with and without LBP. In 20 subjects (10 with LBP and 10 controls), EMG recordings were made with fine-wire electrodes inserted into transversus (TrA), obliquus internus (OI), and externus (OE) abdominis. Rectus abdominis (RA) and anterior deltoid EMG was recorded with surface electrodes. Standing subjects rapidly flexed an arm in response to a light, before and after a small amplitude end range rotational lumbar mobilization at L4-5. In controls, there was no change in trunk muscle EMG during the postural perturbation after SMT. In LBP subjects there was an increase in the postural response of OI and an overall increase in OE EMG. There was no change in TrA or RA EMG. These results indicate that SMT changes the functional activity of trunk muscles in people with LBP, but has no effect on control subjects. Importantly, SMT increased the activity of the oblique abdominal muscles with no change in the deep trunk muscle TrA, which is often the target of exercise interventions.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 6 3%
Chile 2 <1%
France 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Unknown 193 94%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 38 18%
Student > Ph. D. Student 31 15%
Other 22 11%
Researcher 19 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 9%
Other 57 28%
Unknown 21 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 97 47%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 13%
Sports and Recreations 20 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 4%
Engineering 7 3%
Other 17 8%
Unknown 30 15%