↓ Skip to main content

Burden of bacterial resistance among neonatal infections in low income countries: how convincing is the epidemiological evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (93rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
62 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
336 Mendeley
Title
Burden of bacterial resistance among neonatal infections in low income countries: how convincing is the epidemiological evidence?
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2015
DOI 10.1186/s12879-015-0843-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Bich-Tram Huynh, Michael Padget, Benoit Garin, Perlinot Herindrainy, Elsa Kermorvant-Duchemin, Laurence Watier, Didier Guillemot, Elisabeth Delarocque-Astagneau

Abstract

Antibiotic resistance is a threat in developing countries (DCs) because of the high burden of bacterial disease and the presence of risk factors for its emergence and spread. This threat is of particular concern for neonates in DCs where over one-third of neonatal deaths may be attributable to severe infections and factors such as malnutrition and HIV infection may increase the risk of death. Additional, undocumented deaths due to severe infection may also occur due to the high frequency of at-home births in DCs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 336 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sudan 1 <1%
Saint Kitts and Nevis 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 331 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 67 20%
Researcher 38 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 37 11%
Student > Bachelor 25 7%
Student > Postgraduate 19 6%
Other 63 19%
Unknown 87 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 96 29%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 31 9%
Nursing and Health Professions 28 8%
Immunology and Microbiology 21 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 18 5%
Other 45 13%
Unknown 97 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 August 2016.
All research outputs
#4,483,062
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#1,440
of 7,674 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,656
of 261,551 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#11
of 158 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,674 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 261,551 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 158 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.