↓ Skip to main content

Common Mistakes in the Construction of Diagrams in Biological Contexts

Overview of attention for article published in Research in Science Education, July 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
33 Mendeley
Title
Common Mistakes in the Construction of Diagrams in Biological Contexts
Published in
Research in Science Education, July 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11165-014-9419-9
Authors

Lena von Kotzebue, Mariele Gerstl, Claudia Nerdel

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 33 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 33 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Professor > Associate Professor 4 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 12%
Student > Master 3 9%
Student > Bachelor 2 6%
Student > Postgraduate 2 6%
Other 6 18%
Unknown 12 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 10 30%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 2 6%
Linguistics 1 3%
Arts and Humanities 1 3%
Other 3 9%
Unknown 13 39%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2015.
All research outputs
#13,330,644
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Research in Science Education
#223
of 654 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#108,068
of 226,958 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Research in Science Education
#5
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 654 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,958 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.