↓ Skip to main content

Testing After Worked Example Study Does Not Enhance Delayed Problem-Solving Performance Compared to Restudy

Overview of attention for article published in Educational Psychology Review, February 2015
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (69th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (62nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
peer_reviews
1 peer review site
facebook
1 Facebook page
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
52 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
107 Mendeley
Title
Testing After Worked Example Study Does Not Enhance Delayed Problem-Solving Performance Compared to Restudy
Published in
Educational Psychology Review, February 2015
DOI 10.1007/s10648-015-9297-3
Authors

Tamara van Gog, Liesbeth Kester, Kim Dirkx, Vincent Hoogerheide, Joris Boerboom, Peter P. J. L. Verkoeijen

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 107 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 <1%
China 1 <1%
Unknown 105 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 18%
Researcher 10 9%
Lecturer 9 8%
Student > Bachelor 7 7%
Other 17 16%
Unknown 20 19%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 29 27%
Social Sciences 27 25%
Medicine and Dentistry 4 4%
Computer Science 3 3%
Linguistics 3 3%
Other 15 14%
Unknown 26 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 August 2016.
All research outputs
#7,709,742
of 25,363,685 outputs
Outputs from Educational Psychology Review
#455
of 776 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,652
of 269,791 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Educational Psychology Review
#4
of 8 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,363,685 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 69th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 776 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.3. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 269,791 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 8 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.