↓ Skip to main content

Scientific kinds

Overview of attention for article published in Philosophical Studies, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
101 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
51 Mendeley
Title
Scientific kinds
Published in
Philosophical Studies, February 2014
DOI 10.1007/s11098-014-0301-4
Authors

Marc Ereshefsky, Thomas A. C. Reydon

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 50 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 18%
Student > Master 7 14%
Student > Bachelor 5 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 8%
Other 9 18%
Unknown 6 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Philosophy 30 59%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 8%
Arts and Humanities 3 6%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 2 4%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 4%
Other 4 8%
Unknown 6 12%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 March 2015.
All research outputs
#20,264,045
of 22,794,367 outputs
Outputs from Philosophical Studies
#1,095
of 1,274 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#189,920
of 221,252 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Philosophical Studies
#10
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,794,367 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,274 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.2. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,252 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.