| Title |
F-18-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography Imaging-Assisted Management of Patients With Severe Left Ventricular Dysfunction and Suspected Coronary Disease A Randomized, Controlled Trial (PARR-2)
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, October 2007
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2007.09.006 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob S.B. Beanlands, Graham Nichol, Ella Huszti, Dennis Humen, Normand Racine, Michael Freeman, Karen Y. Gulenchyn, Linda Garrard, Robert deKemp, Ann Guo, Terrence D. Ruddy, Francois Benard, André Lamy, Robert M. Iwanochko, PARR-2 Investigators |
| Abstract |
We conducted a randomized trial to assess the effectiveness of F-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography (PET)-assisted management in patients with severe ventricular dysfunction and suspected coronary disease. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 2 | 25% |
| United States | 2 | 25% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 25% |
| Scientists | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 206 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Ukraine | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 202 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 31 | 15% |
| Researcher | 29 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 27 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 19 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 18 | 9% |
| Other | 48 | 23% |
| Unknown | 34 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 130 | 63% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 3% |
| Engineering | 4 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 1% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 18 | 9% |
| Unknown | 42 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 20. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 May 2022.
All research outputs
#1,873,593
of 25,394,764 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#4,119
of 16,747 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#3,900
of 83,379 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#7
of 87 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,394,764 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 16,747 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 83,379 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 87 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.