↓ Skip to main content

Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness

Overview of attention for article published in Experimental Brain Research, July 2010
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (86th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
5 X users
patent
1 patent
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page
video
1 YouTube creator

Citations

dimensions_citation
170 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
355 Mendeley
citeulike
6 CiteULike
Title
Human olfaction: a constant state of change-blindness
Published in
Experimental Brain Research, July 2010
DOI 10.1007/s00221-010-2348-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lee Sela, Noam Sobel

Abstract

Paradoxically, although humans have a superb sense of smell, they don't trust their nose. Furthermore, although human odorant detection thresholds are very low, only unusually high odorant concentrations spontaneously shift our attention to olfaction. Here we suggest that this lack of olfactory awareness reflects the nature of olfactory attention that is shaped by the spatial and temporal envelopes of olfaction. Regarding the spatial envelope, selective attention is allocated in space. Humans direct an attentional spotlight within spatial coordinates in both vision and audition. Human olfactory spatial abilities are minimal. Thus, with no olfactory space, there is no arena for olfactory selective attention. Regarding the temporal envelope, whereas vision and audition consist of nearly continuous input, olfactory input is discreet, made of sniffs widely separated in time. If similar temporal breaks are artificially introduced to vision and audition, they induce "change blindness", a loss of attentional capture that results in a lack of awareness to change. Whereas "change blindness" is an aberration of vision and audition, the long inter-sniff-interval renders "change anosmia" the norm in human olfaction. Therefore, attentional capture in olfaction is minimal, as is human olfactory awareness. All this, however, does not diminish the role of olfaction through sub-attentive mechanisms allowing subliminal smells a profound influence on human behavior and perception.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 355 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 1%
Sweden 4 1%
Netherlands 3 <1%
United Kingdom 3 <1%
France 2 <1%
Chile 2 <1%
Portugal 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
Italy 1 <1%
Other 7 2%
Unknown 326 92%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 71 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 63 18%
Student > Master 60 17%
Student > Bachelor 34 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 23 6%
Other 69 19%
Unknown 35 10%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 100 28%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 66 19%
Neuroscience 36 10%
Medicine and Dentistry 27 8%
Chemistry 17 5%
Other 58 16%
Unknown 51 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 October 2021.
All research outputs
#3,525,528
of 24,677,985 outputs
Outputs from Experimental Brain Research
#260
of 3,374 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,248
of 99,302 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Experimental Brain Research
#4
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,677,985 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,374 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 99,302 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.