↓ Skip to main content

The relationship between facial shape asymmetry and attractiveness in Mexican students

Overview of attention for article published in American Journal of Human Biology, November 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

facebook
1 Facebook page
video
2 YouTube creators

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
70 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
The relationship between facial shape asymmetry and attractiveness in Mexican students
Published in
American Journal of Human Biology, November 2014
DOI 10.1002/ajhb.22657
Pubmed ID
Authors

Arodi Farrera, María Villanueva, Mirsha Quinto‐Sánchez, Rolando González‐José

Abstract

It has been postulated that symmetric faces are considered more attractive than asymmetric ones because symmetry may signal high quality due to developmental stability. However, other studies showed that both symmetric and slightly asymmetric faces are considered attractive. Here we aim to explore this discrepancy, beginning with the analysis of the normal prevalence of facial symmetry in a population as a necessary first step prior to any attractiveness assessment.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 70 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Sweden 1 1%
Argentina 1 1%
Unknown 68 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 17%
Student > Master 10 14%
Student > Bachelor 7 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 9%
Professor 4 6%
Other 17 24%
Unknown 14 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 17 24%
Medicine and Dentistry 15 21%
Psychology 11 16%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 4%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 5 7%
Unknown 16 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 February 2023.
All research outputs
#19,303,935
of 24,577,646 outputs
Outputs from American Journal of Human Biology
#1,262
of 1,581 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#257,565
of 371,118 outputs
Outputs of similar age from American Journal of Human Biology
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,577,646 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,581 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.5. This one is in the 16th percentile – i.e., 16% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 371,118 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.